Re: [Re: 2.6.20-rc3-mm1] BUG: at kernel/sched.c:3415 sub_preempt_count()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:50:20PM +0100, Maciej Rutecki wrote:
> Frederik Deweerdt napisał(a):
> 
> > See:
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/hot-fixes/
> > This should fix it.
> > Regards,
> > Frederik
> >>
> 
> I don't use reiser4 or cpufreq, see my .config.
The generic_sync_sb_inodes() function which gets fixed by the
reiser4-sb_sync_inodes-fix patch isn't only used by reiser4. The
spinlock unbalance is most likely responsible for the preempt_count
mismatch.

Regards,
Frederik
> 
> -- 
> Maciej Rutecki <[email protected]>
> http://www.unixy.pl
> LTG - Linux Testers Group
> (http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/ltg/wiki/)
> 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux