Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 1/4] futex priority based wakeup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Pierre Peiffer <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 1/4] futex priority based wakeup
From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 08:29:02 -0800
Cc: LKML <[email protected]>, Dinakar Guniguntala <[email protected]>, Jean-Pierre Dion <[email protected]>, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>, Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]>, Darren Hart <[email protected]>, Sébastien Dugué <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219)

Pierre Peiffer wrote:
> This patch makes use of plist (pirotity ordered lists) instead of simple
> list in
> futex_hash_bucket.

I have never seen performance numbers for this.  If it is punishing
existing code in a measurable way I think it's not anacceptable default
behavior.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 1/4] futex priority based wakeup
  - From: Pierre Peiffer <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 1/4] futex priority based wakeup
  - From: Pierre Peiffer <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/10] cxgb3 - main header files
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/24] Unionfs: Documentation
Previous by thread: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 1/4] futex priority based wakeup
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 1/4] futex priority based wakeup
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux