Akula2 <[email protected]> wrote:
> This question might sound dumb for many, and to some annoying too ;-)
It's OK if you don't do it too often ;-)
[...]
> I did understand till here. Should I start compile/test/debug
> one-after-one in this fashion:-
>
> 2.6.19 source + patch-2.6.20-rc1
> 2.6.19 source + patch-2.6.20-rc2
> 2.6.19 source + patch-2.6.20-rc3
> 2.6.19 source + patch-2.6.20-rc4
>
> OR
>
> Pick the latest release number?
Pick the latest, it has bugs in earlier ones fixed. But it might have its
own ;-)
BTW, you can track the day-to-day development of the kernel (and other
stuff) using git, which has other nifty features (like being able to go
back to an earlier version, and even automate the finding of the broken
patch by narrowing down from a known good and a known bad version).
git is probably in your distribution, or you can get it (as source, or
prebuilt) from <http://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git>, a bunch of
documentation is in the package itself or at <http://www.git.or.cz>.
<http://www.kernel.org> gives pointers to several git kernel repositories.
Good luck!
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
