Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Stable kvm userspace interface

On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Can we please avoid adding a ton of new ioctls?  ioctls inevitably 
> require 64-bit compat code for certain architectures, whereas 
> sysfs/procfs does not.

I guess ioctl is not as important now if the API is now always talking to 
one VM.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC] Stable kvm userspace interface
    • From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] Stable kvm userspace interface
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/10] cxgb3 - main header files
• Next by Date: [ALSA PATCH] alsa-git merge request
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Stable kvm userspace interface
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Stable kvm userspace interface
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]