Hello Philip,
On Thursday 04 January 2007 16:04, Philip Langdale wrote:
> This change depends on my SDHC patch and fixes a bug that was revealed
> during the development of that patch. The R6 response type should be
> identical to R1 (and R7) but was incorrectly defined differently. Fixing
> the R6 definition breaks assumptions in these two drivers that response
> type flags are unique. Pierre and Alex both believe that treating R6 and R7
> as R1 will be sufficient. ie: The controllers do not care about the
> differences between them. Due to lack of hardware, I have done no testing.
I have tested your patch.
Kernel builds. I have not found much time for testing.
But I would not like to block changes and I am going
for next week to project meeting in Spain, so there is
my reply.
I have 2.6.19 + realtime-patches rt14 on the hand.
I have been able to mount and use some cards, but it
I have observed some problems probably related to timing
when I have tried to change CPU frequency.
I need to find time to do more checking on vanilla and RT kernels
when I return. I have some ideas what could be enhanced to ensure
better MX1 SDHC cards recognition under RT kernels. I am not sure,
what causes other seen problems, but I have observed these things
on RT even without your patch.
Conclusion: I knowledge your patch and admit, that I need to
find time for my homeworks.
Best wishes
Pavel Pisa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
