Mikael Pettersson wrote:
The PATA support patch for sata_promise appears, from
code inspection, to break the PATA-only 20619 chip.
The patch removes the SATA flag from the TX2plus SATA+PATA
boards' common flags, with the intention of adding it back
via the _port_flags[] entries for those boards' SATA ports.
However, it unconditionally marks ports 0 and 1 as SATA
for all boards. This causes the 20619 (TX4000) to announce
its first two PATA ports as SATA | ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS.
I don't have a TX4000 so I don't know what the actual
consequences of this bug are, but surely this isn't Ok.
Fixed by moving the port 0 and 1 settings as SATA into
the TX4 and TX2plus specific initialisation code.
Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson <[email protected]>
Given that I agree with your RFC, this means I can drop all these
#promise-sata-pata patches, and kill the #promise-sata-pata branch soon,
right?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
