Re: [patch] paravirt: isolate module ops

On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 19:31 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 03:18:45AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > PS.  drm_memory.h has a "drm_follow_page": this forces us to uninline
> > various page tables ops.  Can this use follow_page() somehow, or do we
> > need an "__follow_page" export for this case?
> 
> Not if avoidable.  And it seems avoidable as drm really should be using
> vmalloc_to_page.  Untested patch below:

Thanks Christoph, that patch looks great to me!  I didn't know about
vmalloc_to_page...

Want to produce a signed-off version?

Thanks,
Rusty.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] paravirt: isolate module ops
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] paravirt: isolate module ops
    • From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] paravirt: isolate module ops
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] paravirt: isolate module ops
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] paravirt: isolate module ops
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] paravirt: isolate module ops
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: OT: character encodings (was: Linux 2.6.20-rc4)
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.20-rc3: known unfixed regressions - x86_64 boot failure: "IO-APIC + timer doesn't work"
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] paravirt: isolate module ops
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] paravirt: isolate module ops
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]