On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 10:03:36AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > The problem is that I have no sufficient FS knowledge to argument why > it helps here. It was a desperate attempt to fix the problem for us > and it definitely worked well. XFS does rather efficient btree directories, and it does sophisticated readahead for directories. I suspect that's what is helping you there. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- References:
- Re: [KORG] Re: kernel.org lies about latest -mm kernel
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: [KORG] Re: kernel.org lies about latest -mm kernel
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- How git affects kernel.org performance
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: [KORG] Re: kernel.org lies about latest -mm kernel
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] include/linux/slab.h: new KFREE() macro.
- Next by Date: [S390] memory detection misses 128k.
- Previous by thread: Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- Next by thread: Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- Index(es):
 |