Re: [DISCUSS] Making system calls more portable.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/07/2007 09:15 AM, Amit Choudhary wrote:

Well, system calls today are not portable mainly because they are
invoked using a number and it may happen that a number 'N' may refer
to systemcall_1() on one system/kernel and to systemcall_2() on
another system/kernel.

If we're limited to Linux kernels, this seems to not be the case. Great care is taken in keeping this userspace ABI stable -- new system calls are given new numbers. Old system calls may disappear (after a long grace period) but even then I don't believe the number is ever recycled.

If your discussion is not limited to Linux kernels, then sure, but being portable at that (sub-libc) level is asking too much.

I hope that I made some sense.

Some, but your supposition seems unclear.

Rene
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux