On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 11:18 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> >>> BTW, yesterday my 2.4 patches were not published, but I noticed that
> >>> they were not even signed not bziped on hera. At first I simply thought
> >>> it was related, but right now I have a doubt. Maybe the automatic script
> >>> has been temporarily been disabled on hera too ?
> >> The script that deals with the uploads also deals with the packaging -
> >> so yes the problem is related.
> >
> > and with the finger_banner and version info on www.kernel.org page?
>
> Yes, they're all connected.
>
> The load on *both* machines were up above the 300s yesterday, probably
> due to the release of a new Knoppix DVD.
>
> The most fundamental problem seems to be that I can't tell currnt Linux
> kernels that the dcache/icache is precious, and that it's way too eager
> to dump dcache and icache in favour of data blocks. If I could do that,
> this problem would be much, much smaller.
>
> -hpa
Isn't setting the vm.vfs_cache_pressure sysctl below 100 supposed to do
this?
--
Nicholas Miell <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
