Re: 2.6.20-rc3 regression? hdparm shows 1/2...1/3 the throughput

On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Stefan Richter wrote:

> Did anybody else notice this?  The result of "hdparm -t" under 2.6.20-rc
> seems to be less than half of what you get on 2.6.19.  However, disk I/O
> did *not* get slower according to bonnie++.

yes. See
  http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/2/75
for the solution.

Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 2.6.20-rc3 regression? hdparm shows 1/2...1/3 the throughput
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • 2.6.20-rc3 regression? hdparm shows 1/2...1/3 the throughput
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] sysrq: showBlockedTasks is sysrq-W
• Next by Date: Re: [KORG] Re: kernel.org lies about latest -mm kernel
• Previous by thread: 2.6.20-rc3 regression? hdparm shows 1/2...1/3 the throughput
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.20-rc3 regression? hdparm shows 1/2...1/3 the throughput
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]