* Rusty Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
> diff -r 48f31ae5d7b5 arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c
> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c Sat Jan 06 10:32:24 2007 +1100
> +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c Sat Jan 06 17:23:12 2007 +1100
> @@ -596,6 +596,154 @@ static int __init print_banner(void)
> return 0;
> }
> core_initcall(print_banner);
> +
> +unsigned long paravirt_save_flags(void)
> +{
> + return paravirt_ops.save_fl();
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(paravirt_save_flags);
ok, i like this one too - i agree that it's better than mine because it
isolates on a per-API level not on a per-lowlevel-paravirt-op level. But
this doesnt do the most crutial step: the removal of the paravirt_ops
export. Without that the module build test is pointless.
btw., your patch does not apply to current -git - could you please
rebase this patch to the head of your queue so that upstream can pick it
up?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
