Re: 2.6.20-rc2-mm1 -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected

On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > 
> > But anyway, Kay, I thought that 10.2 would work with
> > CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y?
> 
> Yes, HAL, udev, NetworkManager, ... from 10.2 works fine here, without
> that option set.

I'm using ifplugd rather than NetworkManager: would that affect it?

Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: 2.6.20-rc2-mm1 -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.20-rc2-mm1 -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected
    • From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.20-rc2-mm1 -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.20-rc2-mm1 -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected
    • From: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH, RFC] reimplement flush_workqueue()
• Next by Date: Re: [BUG-RT] RTC has been stopped-> long delay during boot, soft reboot->GRUB fails to call getrtsecs()
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.20-rc2-mm1 -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected
• Next by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.16.37
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]