Re: [PATCH] Fix __ucmpdi2 in v4l2_norm_to_name()

Le jeudi 04 janvier 2007 à 20:59 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab a écrit :

> > The largest value we use here is 0x02000000.  Perhaps v4l2_std_id shouldn't
> > be 64-bit?
> Too late to change it to 32 bits. It is at V4L2 userspace API since
> kernel 2.6.0. We can, however use this approach as a workaround, with
> the proper documentation.

Maybe with a BUG_ON(id > UINT_MAX) ?

Linus, do you want a patch for this or will you take the _ucmppdi2 ppc
patch as per http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/17/46 instead ?

Thanks,

Stelian.
-- 
Stelian Pop <[email protected]>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix __ucmpdi2 in v4l2_norm_to_name()
    • From: Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Fix __ucmpdi2 in v4l2_norm_to_name()
    • From: Stelian Pop <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix __ucmpdi2 in v4l2_norm_to_name()
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix __ucmpdi2 in v4l2_norm_to_name()
    • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix __ucmpdi2 in v4l2_norm_to_name()
• Next by Date: Re: [UPDATED PATCH] fix memory corruption from misinterpreted bad_inode_ops return values
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix __ucmpdi2 in v4l2_norm_to_name()
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix __ucmpdi2 in v4l2_norm_to_name()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]