On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 05:26:43PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> >Hm, but I guess without the follow-up patches for libata, it will not
> >really get tested much. Jeff, if I accept this, what's your feelings of
> >letting libata be the "test bed" for it?
>
>
> It would be easiest for me to merge this through my
> libata-dev.git#upstream tree. That will auto-propagate it to -mm, and
> ensure that both base and libata bits are sent in one batch.
>
> Just shout if you see NAK-able bits...
>
> Work for you?
That works for me.
The only question I have is on the EXPORT_SYMBOL() stuff for the new
driver/base/ functions. Tejun, traditionally the driver core has all
exported symbols marked with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). So, any objection to
marking the new ones (becides the "mirror" functions) in this manner?
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
