Re: [PATCH 2/2] Handle error in sync_sb_inodes()

Andrew Morton a écrit :

There's a lot of sloppiness in there.  Do these two patches fix things up?

Still no luck :-(
It seems you made it possible for sync() to be aware of the returned
value, but there's nothing it can do with it since it's 'void sync()'.
Then msync() comes after and sees nothing in the mapping flags.


Cheers.

--
Guillaume

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 2/2] Handle error in sync_sb_inodes()
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/2] Handle error in sync_sb_inodes()
    • From: Guillaume Chazarain <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/2] Handle error in sync_sb_inodes()
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 2.6.19] mmc: Add support for SDHC cards (Take 5)
• Next by Date: NCPFS and brittle connections
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Handle error in sync_sb_inodes()
• Next by thread: [RFC][PATCH] use cycle_t instead of u64 in struct time_interpolator
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]