RE: [PATCH] lock stat for -rt 2.6.20-rc2-rt2.2.lock_stat.patch

Bill Huey (hui) wrote:
> 
> Thanks, the numbers look a bit weird in that the first column should
> have a bigger number of events than that second column since it is a
> special case subset. Looking at the lock_stat_note() code should show
> that to be the case. Did you make a change to the output ?

No, I did not change the output.  I did reset to the contention content

by doing echo "0" > /proc/lock_stat/contention.

I noticed that the first column get reset but not the second column. So
the reset code probably need to be checked.

Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] lock stat for -rt 2.6.20-rc2-rt2.2.lock_stat.patch
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] lock stat for -rt 2.6.20-rc2-rt2.2.lock_stat.patch
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [2.6 patch] proper prototype for x25_init_timers()
• Next by Date: xfs_file_ioctl / xfs_freeze: BUG: warning at kernel/mutex-debug.c:80/debug_mutex_unlock()
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] lock stat for -rt 2.6.20-rc2-rt2.2.lock_stat.patch
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] lock stat for -rt 2.6.20-rc2-rt2.2.lock_stat.patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]