On Wednesday 03 January 2007 09:34, Martin Josefsson wrote: > I saw your (correct) analysis after having made the patch below, it has > been tested successfully by Bernhard Schmidt. (Netfilter bugzilla #528) > > Check the return value of nfct_nat() in device_cmp(), we might very well > have non NAT conntrack entries as well. > I was not capable to reproduce the problem. Thanks :) > Signed-off-by: Martin Josefsson <[email protected]> > > --- linux-2.6.20-rc3/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_MASQUERADE.c.orig 2007-01-02 > 22:47:14.000000000 +0100 +++ > linux-2.6.20-rc3/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_MASQUERADE.c 2007-01-02 > 22:57:11.000000000 +0100 @@ -127,10 +127,13 @@ > static inline int > device_cmp(struct ip_conntrack *i, void *ifindex) > { > + int ret; > #ifdef CONFIG_NF_NAT_NEEDED > struct nf_conn_nat *nat = nfct_nat(i); > + > + if (!nat) > + return 0; > #endif > - int ret; > > read_lock_bh(&masq_lock); > #ifdef CONFIG_NF_NAT_NEEDED -- --------------------------------------- Malte Schröder [email protected] ICQ# 68121508 ---------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgphp56Uzvsvg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: [BUG] panic 2.6.20-rc3 in nf_conntrack
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] panic 2.6.20-rc3 in nf_conntrack
- From: Martin Josefsson <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] panic 2.6.20-rc3 in nf_conntrack
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] use cycle_t instead of u64 in struct time_interpolator
- Next by Date: Re: Subject: [PATCH 2/2] EDAC: K8 Memory scrubbing patch
- Previous by thread: Re: [BUG] panic 2.6.20-rc3 in nf_conntrack
- Next by thread: Re: [BUG] panic 2.6.20-rc3 in nf_conntrack
- Index(es):
 |