Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] Linux RDMA Core Changes

On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 17:02 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I've run this code with mthca and didn't notice any performance
> > degradation, but I wasn't specifically measuring cq_poll overhead in a
> > tight loop...
> 
> We were speaking about ib_req_notify_cq here, actually, not cq poll.
> So what was tested?
> 

Sorry, I meant req_notify.  I didn't specifically measure the cost of
req_notify before and after this change.

I've been running the user mode perftest programs mainly.  



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] Linux RDMA Core Changes
    • From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] Linux RDMA Core Changes
    • From: Steve Wise <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] Linux RDMA Core Changes
    • From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386 kernel instant reboot with older binutils fix
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] Linux RDMA Core Changes
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] Linux RDMA Core Changes
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] Linux RDMA Core Changes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]