Re: [PATCH 2.6.19.1-rt15][RFC] - futex_requeue_pi implementation (requeue from futex1 to PI-futex2)

Ingo Molnar a écrit :

looks good to me in principle. The size of the patch is scary - is there really no simpler way?

Humf, in fact, for the 64-bit part, I've followed the rule of the existing 64-bit code in futex.c, which consists of duplicating all the functions which can not be kept common, and add a suffix 64 to all duplicated functions.

Perhaps I missed something ?

Also, could you send me a patch against a 20-rc3-rt0-ish kernel so that i can stick this into -rt for testing?

Ok, will do that.

Thanks,

--
Pierre Peiffer
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.19.1-rt15][RFC] - futex_requeue_pi implementation (requeue from futex1 to PI-futex2)
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 2.6.19.1-rt15][RFC] - futex_requeue_pi implementation (requeue from futex1 to PI-futex2)
    • From: Pierre Peiffer <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.19.1-rt15][RFC] - futex_requeue_pi implementation (requeue from futex1 to PI-futex2)
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] Linux RDMA Core Changes
• Next by Date: Re: sched_clock() on i386
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19.1-rt15][RFC] - futex_requeue_pi implementation (requeue from futex1 to PI-futex2)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19.1-rt15][RFC] - futex_requeue_pi implementation (requeue from futex1 to PI-futex2)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]