Re: [PATCH] slab: cache alloc cleanups

On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:47:06 +0200 (EET)
Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have been unable to find a NUMA-capable tester for this patch, 

Any x86_64 box can be used to test NUMA code via the numa=fake=N boot option.

fake-numa is somewhat sick in mainline and you might find that it doesn't
work right on some machines, or that it fails with high values of N, but
works OK with N=2.  There are fixes to address this problem in -mm.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] slab: cache alloc cleanups
    • From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Open letter to Linux kernel developers (was Re: Binary Drivers)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] slab: add missing debug_check_no_locks_freed for kmem_cache_free
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] slab: cache alloc cleanups
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] slab: cache alloc cleanups
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]