Re: Should be [PATCH -mm] -- Re: [PATCH -rt] panic on SLIM + selinux

On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 13:05 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Being able to compile both SELinux and SLIM into the kernel was done
> intentionally.  The kernel parameters 'selinux' and 'slim' can enable
> or disable the LSM module at boot.  Perhaps, for the time being, the
> SECURITY_SLIM_BOOTPARAM_VALUE should default to 0.

They currently don't play nice together, i.e. the kernel panics with
both compiled in together and default settings. So something needs to
change..

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: Should be [PATCH -mm] -- Re: [PATCH -rt] panic on SLIM + selinux
    • From: Mimi Zohar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: tty->low_latency + irq context
• Next by Date: [OT] Hot coffee (was: Open letter to Linux kernel developers (was Re: Binary Drivers))
• Previous by thread: Re: Should be [PATCH -mm] -- Re: [PATCH -rt] panic on SLIM + selinux
• Next by thread: Re: Should be [PATCH -mm] -- Re: [PATCH -rt] panic on SLIM + selinux
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]