> with tty->low_latency set, but it doesn't AFAICS. One possibility for
> deadlock is if the tty->buf.lock spinlock is taken on behalf of a user
> process...
The case to watch out for is
flip_buffer_push -> ldisc -> driver write of echo/^S/^Q
if you call flip_buffer_push while holding your own lock you may get in
a mess on the echo path.
> * data is received, enough to completely fill the tty buffer
> * tty_flip_buffer_push() schedules flush_to_ldisc()
> * before flush_to_ldisc() runs, more data is received
> * flush_to_ldisc() truncates the incoming data (look for
> tty->receive_room)
>
> I don't see how this is supposed to work in general.
For non fake tty hardware at real speeds it wasn't a problem under about
1Mbit. Current tty layer code just uses memory buffering based on kmalloc
and has a 64K limit instead. Works better SMP, scales better and we no
longer need to do stunts like the flip buffers to scrape 56Kbit on a
386SX16
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
