Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 1/6] GPIO core

Hi!

> > > Should it instead say that's an (obviously unchecked) error?
> > 
> > Saying it is an error would be okay by me. (Or "Behaviour of these calls for
> > GPIOs that can't be safely accessed without sleeping is undefined.").
> 
> See the appended doc patch ... better?

Yes, thanks.
									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 1/6] GPIO core
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 1/6] GPIO core
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: mount --bind and /proc/mounts
• Next by Date: Re: [FSAIO][PATCH 6/8] Enable asynchronous wait page and lock page
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 1/6] GPIO core
• Next by thread: Cut power to a USB port?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]