Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.

If people want to return something from a ({ }) construct, they should do it

explicitly, e.g.

#define setcc(cc) ({ \
	partial_status &= ~(SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3); \
	partial_status |= (cc) & (SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3); \
	partial_status; \
})

No, they generally should use an inline function instead.


Segher

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] mmc: Add support for SDHC cards
• Next by Date: [PATCH] sound: hda: detect ALC883 on MSI K9A Platinum motherboards (MS-7280)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]