Re: replace "memset(...,0,PAGE_SIZE)" calls with "clear_page()"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:42:31 +0900 Paul Mundt wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 02:59:32AM +0100, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> > > > regarding alignment that don't allow clear_page() to be used
> > > > copy_page() in the memcpy() case), but it's going to need a lot of
> > 
> > Maybe these optimalisations should be in the coding style docs?
> > 
> For what purpose? CodingStyle is not about documenting usage constraints
> for every minor part of the kernel. If someone intends to use an API,
> it's up to them to figure out the semantics for doing so. Let's not
> confuse common sense with style.
> -

I agree, these aren't CodingStyle material.  They could make sense
in some other doc, either MM/VM-related or more general.

I've often wanted a somewhat introductory doc about Linux environmental
assumptions (memory model, pointers/longs, data cleared to 0,
many other items that I don't have on my fingertips).

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux