On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:45:08 +0000
Russell King <[email protected]> wrote:
> The kernel community needs to get a grip with the implementation of
> new syscalls - we need a process where architecture maintainers get
> to review the arguments _prior_ to them being accepted into the kernel.
> That way we can avoid silly architecture specific syscall changes like
> this.
hm, well, actually, sys_fadvise64_64 was discussed on linux-arch when
it went in.
(Gad, it was over three years ago! - glibc support should be pretty widespread
now)
That's about as much discussion as these things will get. And this assumes
that people remember to mention it. Mental note made.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
