Re: 2.6.19.1-rt15: BUG in __tasklet_action at kernel/softirq.c:568

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 20:50 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Robert Crocombe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > On 12/19/06, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >yeah. This is something that triggers very rarely on certain boxes. Not
> > > >fixed yet, and it's been around for some time.
> > > 
> > > Is there anything you would like me to do to help diagnose this?
> > 
> > to figure out what the bug is :-/ Below is the tasklet redesign patch - 
> > the bug must be in there somewhere.
> 
> > +static inline int tasklet_tryunlock(struct tasklet_struct *t)
> > +{
> > +	return cmpxchg(&t->state, TASKLET_STATEF_RUN, 0) == TASKLET_STATEF_RUN;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> This probably isn't it, but is cmpxchg available on all archs now?

yeah, it's probably not related, i saw these failures on plain i686 too, 
which definitely has cmpxchg support. The failures i saw happened on a 
hyperthreading CPU, so i guess it must be some sort of narrow race.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux