Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/13/06, Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]> wrote:
Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> writes:
> the numa case is already handled; the needed info for that is exposed already
> enough... at least for irqbalance

What is the problem you are trying to solve?

If it is just interrupts irqbalanced can't help with we can do that
with a single bit.

My basic problem with understanding what this patch is trying to
solve is that I've seen some theoretical cases raised but I don't see
the real world problem.

Good question.

irqbalance could use set_affinity from boot cpu to final cpu.

YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux