On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 22:29 +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:56:20 +0100 Richard Knutsson wrote:
> >> Guess this is the desired fix, since including linux/sched.h in linux/freezer.h
> >> make little sense.
> >>
> >
> > Why do you say that? freezer.h is what uses those #defined values,
> > and freezer.h is what uses struct task_struct fields as well,
> > so it needs sched.h.
> >
> Oh, an error of thought when I read the patch
> 7dfb71030f7636a0d65200158113c37764552f93 made that statement. After more
> checking, sched.h is apperarently included in suspend.h from swap.h so
> the direct include of sched.h in most drivers was/is not nessecary.
>
> Do you agree with the patch below then? This was how I first fixed it
> but found it strange no-one hit it before, and from there it went on...
> Thanks for the help. (Sign it?)
Randy had already submitted a similar patch to lkml.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=116561219801397&w=2
> ---
>
> Compile-tested only.
>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/freezer.h b/include/linux/freezer.h
> index 6e05e3e..f616c0c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/freezer.h
> +++ b/include/linux/freezer.h
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> /* Freezer declarations */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
Thanks anyway,
Shaggy
--
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
