Re: [PATCH 0/3] New firewire stack

On Tue, Dec 05, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:

> I'm announcing an alternative firewire stack that I've been working on

I suggest you hash out the most obvious bugs in -mm.
Once it you have it in a reasonable shape, replace the drivers in
drivers/ieee1394 in one go.
Its just not worth the pain to switch from module a.ko to module b.ko,
keep the name a.ko because its the very same functionality after all.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/3] New firewire stack
    • From: "Kristian Høgsberg" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fsstack: Fix up ecryptfs's fsstack usage
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ide-cd: Handle strange interrupt on the Intel ESB2
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] New firewire stack
• Next by thread: Oops in pata_pdc2027x
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]