Re: Why SCSI module needed for PCI-IDE ATA only disks ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Garzik wrote:
Bernard Pidoux wrote:
I am asking why need to compile the following modules while I do not
have any SCSI device ?

libata uses SCSI to provide a lot of infrastructure that it would otherwise have to recreate. Also, using SCSI meant that it automatically worked in existing installers.

    Jeff

This confusion could easily be remedied by explaining the requirement in the Help output for libata drivers/section. Also, making a dependency in the menu (since there is one) or automatically selecting the required scsi items when you select a libata driver would seem logical. As it is, nothing is said of scsi requirements in menuconfig. Trying to boot a machine without compiling the scsi drivers (something you're allowed to do) results in a system that boots and initializes the ata busses but can't communicate to any of the drives on them, (useless).


Then maybe later down the road, moving those scsi drivers shared by scsi and libata to the generic block layer would seem logical. That is, when ide is gone from the kernel and all the kernel speaks is scsi, there would be no need to differentiate scsi from the generic block layer devices, and no need to compile "scsi" drivers to have libata driver support, eliminating any possible further confusion.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux