On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:14:37 -0800 Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote: [snip] > Look: > > > + notify->target = target; > > + > > + if (notify->notify == (SIGEV_SIGNAL|SIGEV_THREAD_ID)) { > > + /* > > + * This reference will be dropped in really_put_req() when > > + * we're done with the request. > > + */ > > + get_task_struct(target); > > If that test fails, we've saved a pointer to the task_struct without having > taken a refreence on it. > Aggreed, just wanted to make sure. Thanks, Sébastien. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH -mm 0/4][AIO] - AIO completion signal notification v2
- From: Sébastien Dugué <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm 3/4][AIO] - AIO completion signal notification
- From: Sébastien Dugué <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm 3/4][AIO] - AIO completion signal notification
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm 3/4][AIO] - AIO completion signal notification
- From: Sébastien Dugué <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm 3/4][AIO] - AIO completion signal notification
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm 3/4][AIO] - AIO completion signal notification
- From: Sébastien Dugué <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm 3/4][AIO] - AIO completion signal notification
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [PATCH -mm 0/4][AIO] - AIO completion signal notification v2
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.19-rc6 : Spontaneous reboots, stack overflows - seems to implicate xfs, scsi, networking, SMP
- Next by Date: [PATCH] fs: remove unused variable
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm 3/4][AIO] - AIO completion signal notification
- Next by thread: [PATCH] fs : reorder some 'struct inode' fields to speedup i_size manipulations
- Index(es):
 |