Re: [PATCH 2/4] WorkStruct: Typedef the work function prototype

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Howells wrote:
> Stefan Richter <[email protected]> wrote:
>> If so, it should certainly also be used in the declarations and
>> definitions of the work functions.
> 
> Is this what you mean?:
> 
> 	work_func_t do_my_work
> 	{
> 		...
> 	}

That's what I meant. (But now that you wrote it out I'm not so certain
about doing this anymore.)

> 	DECLARE_WORK(my_work, do_my_work);
> 
> 	void do_it(void)
> 	{
> 		schedule_work(&my_work);
> 	}

-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- =-== =-=--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux