Re: smbfs (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2))

Andrew Morton <[email protected]> writes:

> On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:30:41 +0000 (UTC)
> Oleg Verych <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> [ Adding e-mail of Andrew Morton, he may have clue about who to ping ;]
>> [ MAINTAINERS.smbfs seems to be emply                                 ]
>
> smbfs is unmaintained and we'd like to kill it off.  Please use cifs.

Oh, I wasn't aware that CIFS had become stable enough and smbfs was
deprecated.

I will begin migration to cifs.

Thanks.

Regards
/Rasmus

-- 
Rasmus Bøg Hansen
MSC Aps
Bøgesvinget 8
2740 Skovlunde
44 53 93 66

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2)
    • From: [email protected] (Rasmus Bøg Hansen)
  • smbfs (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2))
    • From: Oleg Verych <[email protected]>
  • Re: smbfs (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2))
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] cpufreq: mark cpufreq_tsc() as core_initcall_sync
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] cpufreq: mark cpufreq_tsc() as core_initcall_sync
• Previous by thread: [patch] smbfs: is obsolete, please use CIFS
• Next by thread: [PATCH] appletouch: use canonical names instead of raw USB IDs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]