Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls

David Brownell wrote:

I suspect that userspace GPIO accessors should only be written once
though, and they're going to be in the "don't care" category.  So
lack of such a "message compatible" GPIO call set might reasonably
hold up merging that sort of (configfs?) interface.

Yes, the userspace interface is by far the biggest issue here.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
• Next by Date: Re: [Opps] Invalid opcode
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
• Next by thread: Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]