Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.

> What if the quality of the bug report is good and the submitter is 
> responsive, and there's still zero reaction?
> 
> Let's make an example:

> 
> Since the first list I sent immediately after 2.6.19-rc1 was released, 
> kernel Bugzilla #7255 is part of my list of 2.6.19-rc regressions but 
> has gotten exactly zero developer responses.

where was the lkml mail for this?

> 
> What exactly were the mistakes of the submitter resulting in noone 
> caring about Bugzilla #7255?

he didn't post to lkml?


-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

• References:
  • A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
    • From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
  • Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] x86_64: Fix partial page check to ensure unusable memory is not being marked usable.
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 5/5] fs: freeze_bdev with semaphore not mutex
• Previous by thread: Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
• Next by thread: Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]