On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 12:27:15 +0100
Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Add a simple GPIO framework for AVR32. This should be fairly similar
> to the AT91 GPIO API, but there are still a couple of differences:
>
> * Naming. We prefix all functions with gpio_ instead of at91_
> * request_gpio() and free_gpio() should be called to make sure
> the required pins are available, but it will still work if you
> don't.
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_gpio);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_gpio);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_set_value);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_get_value);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_set_output_enable);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_set_pullup_enable);
I wonder about this naming choice. I'd have though that if/when the kernel
gets a generic GPIO driver or layer, these avr32-specific symbols will need
renaming.
h8300 uses h8300_free_gpio(), and there's also omap_free_gpio(). Perhaps
this patch should have added avr32_free_gpio()?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
