Re: [PATCH] debug workqueue locking sanity -v2

* Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:

> > > +			|| current->lockdep_depth > 0
> > > +#endif
> > > +			)) {
> > 
> > i agree with this patch, but shouldnt this #ifdef be hidden via some 
> > sort of lockdep_depth() inline in lockdep.h that just returns 0 if 
> > !LOCKDEP?
> 
> Like so.

perfect!

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] debug workqueue locking sanity
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] debug workqueue locking sanity
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] debug workqueue locking sanity -v2
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: 2.6.18.1 broke "make O=... headers_install"
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Net: kconfig, correct traffic shaper
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] debug workqueue locking sanity -v2
• Next by thread: [PATCH 2.6.19 1/4] ehca: assure 4k alignment for firmware control block in 64k page mode
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]