Re: [discuss] Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)

On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:25:37AM +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
 > Could this be a problem?
 > --------------------
 > ...
 > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m
 > ...
 > CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8=y

Hmm, possibly.  Christian, does it work again if you set them both to =y ?

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [discuss] Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)
    • From: Christian <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Linux 2.6.19-rc4
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)
    • From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)
    • From: Alexey Starikovskiy <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: irqpoll kernel option hurts performance?
• Next by Date: Re: async I/O seems to be blocking on 2.6.15
• Previous by thread: Re: [discuss] Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)
• Next by thread: Re: [discuss] Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]