Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised

On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:10:39PM -0500, Holden Karau wrote:
> I was thinking about the issue of running out of memory, while its not
> particularly likely to happen except on devices with huge disks and
> tiney amount of memory, it is a possibility. I can make it
> fall-through to the previous way of doing things, does that sound like
> a reasonable idea?

Yes, or you could make it sync the ones for which you did have enough
memory, and then restart.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
    • From: Holden Karau <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
    • From: "Holden Karau" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
    • From: "Holden Karau" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [take22 0/4] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
• Next by Date: [PATCH] use printk_ratelimit() inside DRM_DEBUG
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]