Whoops, sorry about that. Yes it would improve performance on fat12 &
fat16 [although I haven't tested it with fat12]. What I meant by that
sentance is that, fat sync performance is pretty bad with or without
my patch, its just slightly less worse with my patch :-)
On 10/31/06, OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]> wrote:
"Holden Karau" <[email protected]> writes:
> This patch is just meant to make fat32 sync performance better, not
> necessarily make it usable for everyone [one step at a time and all
> that].
Sorry, I can't see your point. The FAT12 and FAT16 also have backup FAT.
And the your patch didn't make performance better, right?
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
--
Cell: 613-276-1645
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
