Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7437] New: VIA VT8233 seems to suffer from the via latency quirk

I enabled the via latency quirk code for my chipset and my workstation
does crash the same way.
Then, my crash problem seems not related to this quirk even if
symptoms are quite similar.

2006/10/31, Greg KH <[email protected]>:

That would be the best way to proceed.  If you add your device ids to
the quirk, does the machine work properly afterward?

thanks,

greg k-h

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7437] New: VIA VT8233 seems to suffer from the via latency quirk
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7437] New: VIA VT8233 seems to suffer from the via latency quirk
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7437] New: VIA VT8233 seems to suffer from the via latency quirk
    • From: "Sylvain Bertrand" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7437] New: VIA VT8233 seems to suffer from the via latency quirk
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] fs/*: trivial vsnprintf() conversion
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] add dev_to_node()
• Previous by thread: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7437] New: VIA VT8233 seems to suffer from the via latency quirk
• Next by thread: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7437] New: VIA VT8233 seems to suffer from the via latency quirk
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]