Re: [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch

> The problem is, this brings us back to the problem where this whole
> patch orgy began: Gentoo Portage sandbox violations when writing (the
> null symlink) to the kernel tree when building external modules. What
> about using $(M) as a base directory if it is defined?

I think Jan's $(objdir)/.tmp proposal would be cleanest. Just someone
has to implement it :)

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch
    • From: Horst Schirmeier <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch
    • From: Horst Schirmeier <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch
    • From: Oleg Verych <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch
    • From: Horst Schirmeier <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: AMD X2 unsynced TSC fix?
• Next by Date: Re: AMD X2 unsynced TSC fix?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]