Re: [PATCH ??] Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> (it's a separate question if ndiswrapper should be in this table;
> driverloader should be, it's non-GPL at all, so that part of your patch
> is broken)
>   

If driverloader is not GPLed then why does it need to be treated
exceptionally to begin with? It taints the kernel anyway because of its
license.

---
fm

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper
    • From: Pavel Roskin <[email protected]>
  • Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH ??] Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper
    • From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH ??] Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Prep for paravirt: Be careful about touching BIOS address space
• Next by Date: Re: CPU Loading
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH ??] Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper
• Next by thread: Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]