Re: [PATCH] diskquota: 32bit quota tools on 64bit architectures

On Wednesday 25 October 2006 13:25, Vasily Tarasov wrote:
> Actually I didn't use __attribute__, 'case I'v heard,  that this isn't
> encouraged now to use __attribute__((...)) in kernel. But if you think it
> is ok, and even preferable, I will definitely redo it!

You shouldn't use attributes in ABI headers, because they are
not interpreted correctly by every compiler. For stuff inside
of the kernel, I don't see a reason against it.

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] diskquota: 32bit quota tools on 64bit architectures
    • From: Vasily Tarasov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] diskquota: 32bit quota tools on 64bit architectures
    • From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] diskquota: 32bit quota tools on 64bit architectures
    • From: Vasily Tarasov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: What about make mergeconfig ?
• Next by Date: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc3 1/2] ehea: kzalloc GFP_ATOMIC fix
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] diskquota: 32bit quota tools on 64bit architectures
• Next by thread: [2.6 patch] fs/gfs2/dir.c:gfs2_dir_write_data(): remove dead code
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]