Re: [PATCH] Minor fixes to generic do_div

Matthew Wilcox writes:

>   * The semantics of do_div() are:
>   *
> - * uint32_t do_div(uint64_t *n, uint32_t base)
> + * uint32_t do_div(uint64_t n, uint32_t base)

... or would be, if n were passed by reference.  If you're going to
change the comment, I think you should say explicitly that n is
changed.

Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Minor fixes to generic do_div
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.19-rc2-mm2
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: using cpu_online_map instead of APIC_ALL_CPUS
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Minor fixes to generic do_div
• Next by thread: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc2] [REVISED 2] drivers/media/video/se401.c: check kmalloc() return value.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]