Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 09:29:45PM +1300, Glenn Enright wrote:
> Doesnt slackware supply a prebuilt package of the kernel docs in various 
> formats for just this purpose? From what I can recall, redhat and 
> ubuntu both do this.
 
Maybe does. But do you believe there is anybody reading
this list who uses only distro's prebuilt kernel versions?

Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?
    • From: Glenn Enright <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?
    • From: Jarek Poplawski <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?
    • From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?
    • From: Jarek Poplawski <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix potential interrupts during alternative patching [was Re: [RFC] Avoid PIT SMP lockups]
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix potential interrupts during alternative patching [was Re: [RFC] Avoid PIT SMP lockups]
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]