Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device

Jesse Brandeburg wrote:

Is this patch going to go upstream?  I've been testing 2.6.18 on a
couple different systems and seen the same issue.  I haven't tested
the patch yet.

The patch is pending review.

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/13408/focus=13439

--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
    • From: "Joe Jin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
    • From: "Jesse Brandeburg" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt6 sysctl conflict
• Next by Date: [S390] Wire up epoll_pwait syscall.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
• Next by thread: [PATCH] kernel-doc: drop __must_check and various "inline" qualifiers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]