Re: [PATCH 00 of 23][-mm] Unionfs: Stackable Namespace Unification Filesystem

>> Meanwhile, from a quick scan I'd say that unionfs is much, much too
>> lightly
>> commented for a review to be particularly effective.   Please work on
>> that.
>
> - Kill wrappers (e.g. unionfs_kill_block_super can be replaced with
> generic_shutdown_super)

Possibly the unionfs_kill_block_super function was once written with 
more than just generic_shutdown_super in mind. Just a guess, though.


	-`J'
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 00 of 23][-mm] Unionfs: Stackable Namespace Unification Filesystem
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00 of 23][-mm] Unionfs: Stackable Namespace Unification Filesystem
    • From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] stackfs: generic functions for obtaining hidden object
• Next by Date: Sluggish system while copying large files.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 00 of 23][-mm] Unionfs: Stackable Namespace Unification Filesystem
• Next by thread: [PATCH] m68knommu: sync syscalls with m68k
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]